Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
A Turn in the South Paperback – January 1, 2003
There is a newer edition of this item:
- Print length200 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPicador
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2003
- Dimensions5.31 x 0.98 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-100330487183
- ISBN-13978-0330487184
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Product details
- Publisher : Picador (January 1, 2003)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 200 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0330487183
- ISBN-13 : 978-0330487184
- Item Weight : 7.7 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.31 x 0.98 x 8.5 inches
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Not an American, neither White nor Black, certainly not a man of religion, Naipaul credits the comforts and strengths that religiosity brings to Southerners of both races, while he also identifies the stifling consequences. This is easily the most accurate and insightful portrayal of the South that I've ever read, not even excluding literary giants like Faulkner and Welty.
The writing style is remarkably casual, almost off-hand, not at all high-brow, yet the reader will find that Naipaul knows exactly what he wants to say and where he thinks the "turn in the south" will take us.
That the setting is 1985 is important if you're reading the book today. Some of these areas have experienced changes. For example, Greensboro in 1985 had about 160,000 people in 1985, and today, that area has almost 300,000. Forsyth County had about 30,000 mostly white people in 1985; today it has almost 250,000 (including many Asians and Hispanics). The metro Atlanta area had 2-3 million people in 1985. Today, it has around 6 million .... These details mean that some of Naipaul's impressions are outdated or obsolete now. Some of the rural areas that he saw are now urbanized, some of all-white or all-black towns that he saw are now diverse.
Still, the book has value. Naipaul says at the beginning that “What I had heard ... about the racial demeanor of the South had been too shocking. It had tainted the United States, and made me close my mind the South.” So basically, he heard the South was a racist place. But as Naipaul travels throughout the South, he begins to change that outlook. He is able to look beyond racism and see the South as something more, saying “My thoughts … were about the race issue … my subject would become that other South – of order and faith, and music and melancholy – which I didn't know about.” Basically, instead of linking the South negatively to slavery and Jim Crow, Naipaul at the end has learned to link the South to religion, gospel music, Elvis Presley, country music, and rock n' roll. He basically vindicates the South, releasing it from the popular perception as a place of racism and rural backwardness.
For Naipaul, this book stands out for its positivity. His travelogues about the Caribbean and India are laced with criticism, but this book Is not. It appears that Naipaul really likes the South and the people who live there. The book has good writing, but you should know that it can get a little contemplative and poetic. You might have to read slowly to understand what he's saying, so the 300 pages feels like 450-500 pages. Before he visits Graceland, he would spend about 2-3 pages talking about the themes of these travelogues, as if he's trying to justify (to the reader) his decision to visit Graceland. I didn't feel that was necessary for him to do. The passages about catfish and tobacco farming get a little technical and long-winded.
Naipaul offers some insightful thoughts from an Indo-Caribbean's perspective. For example, he notes that African-Americans did not obtain all of their freedoms until the 1960s whereas Afro-Caribbeans got their freedoms about 100 years earlier. But Afro-Caribbeans live in areas abandoned by the British, in tiny islands that fell out of history. In contrast, Afro-Americans live in the most advanced country in the world, so they have more room to go up the ladder. So between the Afro-Caribbeans or the African-Americans, Naipaul provokes the question as to who really got the better deal? It's a unique thought that I never pondered before reading this book.
Overall, I recommend.
Top reviews from other countries
If you want some serious read go for it, I would suggest try to read it in one go or within a week or two. The subject covered is very nicely stringed together throughout the book. Though this is set in the later 80s/early 90s this book still seems relevant with all the recent violence and oppression on certain communities in the US. Its a 5 stars from me.
Lo importante está en el fondo: ¿sigue de moda este libro de finales de los 80? O, dicho de otro modo ¿hemos superado el racismo?. Sigue de moda en muchos testimonios recogidos que hablan de la estremecedora realidad del racismo hasta bien entrados los 80 en un país como EE.UU. No lo hemos superado evidentemente, pese a la elección de Obama para la Casa Blanca. En tal sentido el libro, como su propio autor en muchas de sus demás obras, es ejemplar: proporciona pistas necesarias para comprender el problema.
Mucho se ha avanzado desde entonces y se ha mejorado también pero queda mucho por hacer: lo más defectuoso del libro es que apenas proyecta hacia adelante: no parece crear una expectativa para el futuro inmediato. Y Naipaul no podía ser ajeno a la existencia de Mandela, el principio del fin del apartheid en Sudáfrica (cayó a principios de los 90) y las posibilidades que abría con una enorme carga de frustraciones y rencores. ¿Cómo seguir desde entonces? Naipaul no parece preguntárselo (ni preguntárselo a nadie) y el libro queda cojo, irresuelto.
The past as a wound
An inscription on a grave says it all: `Death saved him the pain of defeat.'
For V.S. Naipaul, the South had moved from crisis to crisis: agricultural and industrial depression; civil-rights movement; the Great Depression; Reconstruction and the Civil War.
`And at the back of it all was the institution that had seeded most of the crises or aggravated them: slavery.'
Slavery and after
`The freed slaves remained, no longer mere units of labor and wealth, a kind of currency; they bore the brunt of the South's anguish.' Now, they are the main beneficiaries of the welfare programs. Other people resent the free check, `seeing people being given for nothing the equivalent of what you've had to work hard to earn. Medicare is another thing.'
On the white side, `a lot of us find it almost too stifling to live with the idea of race. Those black hands, which we hated and feared more than anything in the world.'
On the black side, there is `the burden of being black. There's not a day, not a moment in my life when I don't have to think about the color of my skin. If you were black, you were living in a hostile environment.'
Faith
`Southern people have a tremendous capacity for faith - black and white. The saving grace for black Southerners is the Church.'
But, on the white side, `the religious ideas of the God-given talent, work and accountability coincided with sound business practice, the coincidence of religious devotion and business sense.'
Music
Besides religious music and country music about family values, there is also a contrary current. `Audiences see the singers struggling with their own demons. And they identify with the struggle. White soul music is comparable to the role that music played for slaves. It creates community among oppressed people (blacks and poor whites).'
V.S. Naipaul is a formidable and outspoken traveler with a hawk eye. He never shunts the big questions and goes to the heart of the matter.
This book is a must read for all lovers of V.S. Naipaul's work, by an outstanding Nobel Prize winner.